That's it, many fans are REALLY homophobic!!

I know I'm being a broken record about that subject but that's hard when I made researches and there's always a topic about this kind of rumors. I just came across this thread, created after Dame Elizabeth passed away and couldn't believe what I was reading.

  Fans mad at Liz because she didn't deny Michael's homosexuality

This is an old story but I'm sure a lot of people remembers it. About three weeks after Klein's and Jason story broke up,almost three years ago, Liz Taylor wrote this on twitter: (Read from the bottom)

Her statement caused a little revolution among fans. Was she stating Michael was homosexual but Klein shouldn't have disclosed it?


That time I was already appalled by what some fans said. Though many were happy because Liz slamming Klein was good enough, other claimed they would prefer if she had denied Michael being gay. Some even dared to tweet Liz about what she exactly meant or asked directly if Michael was gay!

The fans tried to give another meaning to what she said. This is a signal they wouldn't stand the idea of Michael being gay... I've read rubbish like "she's surrounded by a lot of gay friends and doesn't want to offend them." wtf?!

So I guess Dame Elizabeth wasn't that afraid to offend them when she denied Rock Hudson's homosexuality - knowing he was!!

Let's be honest here, if Michael wasn't gay, I don't see how talking the truth would offend her gay friends...unless Michael was really gay!
They even brainwashed many fans to believing it was Liz's way to deny it. I got disgusted when a fan said "oh, you're right! ouf!" (noticed the relief?)

I'm not defending Arnold Klein - He isn't having the better behavior after Michael's passing - but I've seen fans calling him a faggot. Yes, you read it right! I'm not saying all fans are homophobic, but some have that innate homophobia on them. 

I talked recently with a fan (Not a rabid one) who said what I already knew: Usually female fans don't like their idols to be gay. They like to imagine romantic and sexual interaction with him.

A gay blog published an article on Michael shortly after his death,saying "he lived a life in the closet". A stupid fan commented the article should have been written by a "mad fag".

Some fans already admited they would be disapointed if Michael was gay.

Some fans laughed at Scott Thorson's anal cancer saying it was karma. I got very offended and sad at it because I have a relative who suffered from cancer. 

Many fans mock Justin Bieber saying he's the King of Gay but God forbid if someone says the same regarding Michael.

Now, creating a thread just to bash a dead woman because she didn't "defend properly" Michael is too low!! I'm talking about who open the thread and some others, not all fans there. Whatever she meant with that tweets, the truth is just one: she knew Michael for more than 25 years and was a good friend of him. The fans should remember she at least defended him against the molestation charges. Sexuality shouldn't be a issue at all. If you're not homophobic, of course.

R.I.P Dame Elizabeth! I hope you're with Michael in Heaven.

J. Randy Taraborrelli announced his departure as a Jackson expert

Michael Jackson's most considered reliable biographer by the fans announced in his facebook he wouldn't answer questions about Michael anymore, for him and the Jackson family sake. The entire note can be read below, even f you hadn't a facebook account

J. Randy Taraborrelli announces departure from Jackson community

Well...

I know I will be mean one more time but...though I have nothing against him (the man can be nice sometimes, yes), I always felt he just wanted to have his ass kissed by the fans,always choosing words and beautiful things to say. I don't know how true is this, I never read his book but it's said among the fans he was one of the responsible for the beginning of the allegations, because of his book. He's even friends with Diane Dimond, who always had an agenda against Michael.

There's doubt if he really knew Michael for 40 years. He just shows the same pic from the 70's over and over again.

Scott Thorson: The fans madness continue

Since Jason Pfeiffer´s appearance two months after Michael´s death, and especially after the way fans treat him after his interview on Extra, I got so disgusted to see how they behave that I wished the gay rumors continue each year after it. They deserve it. They deserve the pain. It´s mean of me, I know. But I´ve had enough of them and their twisted mind.

Well my plague is working…

Scott Thorson claimed again on ET having been in a relationship with Michael, something he already had said in the early 2000’s. He was also the young lover of Liberace. 

Once I heard about it I immediately thought about the fans. Of course they dismissed it as a lie. Again, angry and violent reactions. The scenes that took place almost two years ago, when Jason came forward, happened again. I think Thorson hasn´t any social network. If he has, we know already what fans would do to him. But that didn´t stop them to write angry words to ET on twitter and facebook. 

I know very well if he was a woman the reactions would be very different. I don´t buy the old story “I wouldn´t have a problem if he was gay but he wasn´t and I don´t like someone saying something he wasn´t. They´re calling him a liar.”

I´m not applauding Scott or Jason´s attitude. If Michael was gay, he surely didn´t want anyone to know it. True or not. But his fans act like being gay is a sin or a crime. The few women who came forward when he was alive didn´t provide proof but they weren´t bullied. No fan ever called the womens story “crap” and “bullshit”. More, I´ve seen some proof the fans are in fact a little homophobic. 

Again, if Michael really wasn´t gay, I don´t know why nobody defends him in a more believable way. The alleged girlfriend from the early 80´s, Theresa Gonsalves, claimed in her facebook, shortly after the ET interview, that Michael was with her that time. Majestik Magnificient, the Jackson family friend, slammed Thorson claims through twitter. Shana Mangatal stays silent. Lisa and Debbie as well. The Jackson family, nothing at all. Until now.

I think if a man is brave enough to claim behind a camera that he was the gay lover of the King of Pop, so defending him against such allegations is much more easy. After all, they have the fans entirely support. So why hid behind a PC? 

Why nobody denied that men´s allegations publicly?

I know Michael´s friends denied the gay allegations when asked publicly. But I never saw anyone deny a specific person claim. For me, it´s different slamming someone´s allegations through web or publicly. 

. 

A thought on Michael Jackson´s fans double standards,hate and hypocrisy

To many fans is enough to know Michael through a simple interview or magazines. Or because they´re die hard fans who have known him for many, many years. They seem to forget that Michael had a private life that he could have wanted to keep for himself. So, no, even the die hard fans don´t know him completely. 

But the truth is, they´re convinced they do! 

They even refute something said about Michael with the exhausting argument "Michael said this or that a thousand times, so otherwise is a lie!"

Interestingly, these are the same people who are always quoting Michael:


The press has made up so much...God...awful, horrifying stories...it has made me realize the more often you hear a lie, I mean, you begin to believe it...


He´s completely right. Just because something is said a million times that doesn´t mean that´s the truth. But that´s not the point here.

The point is the fans argument: For them, Michael said the same thing many, many times so that´s a disrespect someone believes otherwise. Yet, they´re always saying that a lie repeated many times can be seen as the truth.

So...Michael could have said a complete lie. But fans argue that he said the same a "thousand times". So, if we follow his ever-repeated quote, he lied but he repeated the lie many, many times so the fans saw it as the truth.

This is a hypocrisy, right?

I´m not calling Michael a liar. But fans should give the same possibility to other people. I mean, just because he was Michael Fucking Jackson, that doesn´t mean we have to give him a free pass for repeating the same thing and see it as truth. There are people who repeats the same things about him but they´re seen as liars by the fans if what they claim isn´t good.

The same argument was claimed concerning Lisa Presley. I didn´t read Frank Cascio´s book but according to people who did so, he claimed that Michael only married her and Debbie because of the Nation of Islam or something like that.

Of course fans of the marriage got angry:

Lisa said over and over again the marriage was real. Period. Why people still insist on that?


Again, the same. I´m not calling her a liar as well. But she could have lied. Just because she said that over and over again that doesn´t mean the truth. Isn´t it what fans always say? But she was Michael´s wife. Of course many fans give her a pass. (though there are fans who really hate her, some people are so mean.)

I remember reading in one board a story about Michael and some woman, I think Diana Ross. Someone said:

That wasn´t the first time someone says that story, It should be truth, then.


Again, the fans contradiction . Or better, they liked that story so for them it was convenient it was the truth.

Fans are also  always claiming they only believe someone who had been in touch with him by some time. But when that person claims something they don´t like, they have their opinion:

Oh he/she didn´t know Michael so well as we think. He/she wasn´t a friend.


They believe more someone who had known Michael for two days and says only positive things about him rather someone who had known him almost a lifetime but had less good things to say.

They can believe some woman had lied about dating Michael but they forgive her because they "cannot blame her" and she was nice for him. But a man could have claim the same and the fans are even able to make death threats.

They threatened Jason Pfeiffer to death because he claimed he and Michael had a relationship but when three women claimed they were the true mothers of Michael´s kids they did nothing at all. And they really lied! Everyone knows the true mother at last of the two older kids is Debbie Rowe! It was a more serious matter, but the fans choose to get angry at Jason instead!

That post shows how even the fans themselves can be more haters and more hypocrites than the press, as they like to say.

Ian Halperin: Michael´s fans "Prophet of Disgrace" -Part One

I will begin that blog post with that quote from David Comfort, concerning his article about Michael Jackson´s autopsy report:

Ian Halperin seems now to have topped Diane “Devil” Dimond on the MJ fan hate list. Virtually everything he writes in Unmasked is dismissed as a lie. But he concludes that MJ was innocent of molestation charges. Don’t fans agree? He writes that MJ was in desperately poor health and had six months to live. Another lie? Jackson died exactly six months later. A coincidence? Or was Halperin part of the murder plot suspected by many MJ fans? 

Unlike many other fans, I´ve read the book Unmasked before I jump to conclusions. For me the book isn´t negative. I´m not so close-minded than I had been furious just because Halperin claimed that Michael was really gay. I can handle it. There are far worse books! Just think about Michael Jackson was my lover or Be Careful who you love. (Or even Pearl Jr book, about Michael being alive! A true disrespect for his family and children!) At least Ian Halperin states Michael´s innocence:

Maybe because they don´t want to be seen as homophobic,the fans alleged that Ian is also a liar because he said Michael had a disease he didn´t had (because it isn´t in the autopsy report...) and he was a drug addict, etc. But I can say firmly:  

Had Ian said that Michael had a lot of women in his life and they wouldn´t mind about the rest!  

Not only innocent but also straight! wow the fans Paradise! 

How I can be so sure, will you ask me?

 Because J.R. Taraborrelli is very impartial in his book The Magic and The Madness, what means he gave also the possibility of Michael being guilty, though he never claims it directly. He claimed also that Michael bleached his skin. But most fans give him a free pass because he was all hearts and roses about Michael and Lisa´s marriage!

Believe it or not, there are actually fans who supports Ian Halperin. Very few journalists made the claim that Michael was innocent, it´s all that matters! Here is a quote from a fan in a board:

I can't believe how homophobic some Michael fans are. If you read Halperin's book instead of just hearing that it was a hatchet job, you wouldn't be surprised that his documentary is good and fair and makes Michael look good. His book does too. Halperin is the first author to PROVE beyond any doubt Michael was innocent of child molestation and that he was the victim of criminal extortionists, and he even showed why Michael paid $20 million to Jordan Chandler (because the insurance company forced him to settle), which is why much of the world thought Michael was guilty. Halperin obtained the document showing that he had no choice but to settle because the insurance company was worried about what a jury might do if Jordan lied to them. Just because Halperin interviewed a couple of Michael's purported gay lovers in his book doesn't mean the book was bad. So what if Michael was gay or wasn't? The fact is that Halperin cleared his name of a much worse accusation and you fans didn't even bother to realize because you're so hung up on the gay thing. No wonder Michael was afraid to come out of the closet if he was gay, which I'm not entirely convinced about. I personally think he was asexual. 

The fan was just wrong in one thing. Aphrodite Jones wrote already a book about Michael´s innocence, Michael Jackson´s Conspiracy. Ian wasn´t the first one.

The most common rumor about Ian Halperin´s book is that it was published purposely after his death. But I´ve made a research on his blog and I saw that he was writing the book at least three months before Michael´s death. Blog´s dates don´t lie. It was also sent for publication before his death. Ian just added the chapters concerning Michael´s death. 

I´ll post the second part soon. 

"That" rumours-Fans also have responsibility for spreading ...

For every Michael Jackson fan that´s no secret he suffered from every kind of rumors through his life:

 He didn´t want to be black, his vitiligo was false, he was a child molester, he was gay, he hated his own race...

For me the worst of all is the molestation one. Nobody, man or woman, deserves to be accused of such a crime unless they committed it. 

I know that most fans think that gay rumors are as bad as those of paedophilia. Of course they don´t like hearing too he didn´t have vitiligo, he bleached his skin and so but the rumors that bug them the most are, without a doubt, the gay and molestation ones. Though, since there are no proof  that Michael  molested a child and he was acquitted, the fans seem to care more about the gay rumors. I mean, I´ve read some fan threads and I can say that threads talking about gay rumours have more posts than others. 

It´s strange, I think. I don´t know if he was gay or not but I will never understand why fans who claim without a doubt he wasn´t gay continue to talk about the subject. Even boards celebrating Michael´s and Lisa marriage have that kind of threads!! 

I once had a conversation with a friend about that subject and she said me that normally when people persists in a subject they supposedly believe it´s a lie it´s for two possible reasons:

-Basically they think there are a possibility to be true but don´t dare to confess;

-Or to mock. 

But when Michael fans open threads about those who spread the gay rumours, they didn´t do that for mocking but for hating!!!

Ok I know those who will read that post will throw rocks at me...but I have to agree!!

If you don´t believe he was gay, that´s it, period! If you don´t believe you don´t persist in the subject!!  

It´s easy to blame the media and others for all the rumours he suffered. But the fans not help, either! 

The more they talk about the subject, the more it will persist. 

The more they talk about it, they are showing his insecurity and fear.

Think about it instead of blaming others.

More coming soon.

To believe...or just "want" to believe?!

A common thing among most fans is the fact they believe or not something, not because they know the truth but they want or not believe it. 
In general, it´s simple:

-Whether it is a positive story...they believe it or at least they take it with a grain of salt.

-But if the story is negative...

ALL LIES!!!

Guys, just because you don´t like to read something, that doesn´t make it a lie. 

I remember reading a discussion about Randy Taraborrelli´s book. During the discussion a fan says,

"Ok for me it´s simple. If the story pleases me, I believe it. If the story is trash, is a lie. lool"

In that case the fan was joking. But in reality, it´s how many fans mind works.

Gut feeling, believing one thing, it´s different to knowing that something is the truth or is a lie!!!

  Later I will discuss with more details that subject.

I´ll quote what a fan with good sense said:

I don´t want a positive or negative book. I just what the truth!

This Unfair World: Michael and his fans

"The World is sick, like a fever."

Michael Jackson´s own words. He was so right...Unfortunately.

War, hatred, hunger.

War between fans. Here's something he wouldn´t like to see.

Between "believers", no believers, fans who simply don´t have the same opnion, chaos reigns.

If someone hasn´t the same opinion..."You´re a hater!"

For many Michael fans, being a true fan means worshiping him.  Believing him without question, quoting him everytime and worst, with the presumption they know Michael  so well as those who really were close to him. Even people who was close to him ccouldn´t know him completely. How simple fans, people apart of his world can claim that they know him?!

No they don´t.

Pretending that he never said a lie or did wrong  in his whole life it´s silly.

Michael was all human, like us.